Magazine Subscribe Events Careers Backblog About Press Releases Media Kit Supplements Books
Top 300 Issue 2007 Latest Issue Archive Editor's Letter From the Publisher Sponsors / Advertisers
Current Issue

Portals
Backbone's information on...


Careers

Data Management

Economic Development

Education

Green

Health

Olympic Tech

Outsourcing 

Security

Social Networking

Tech Associations Canada

Travel

Unified Communications & VoIP

Web 2.0

Wireless 
Multimedia

sponsored by



Videos - NEW

Small Business
Case Studies -NEW

Webcasts

How-to Guides

Guide for Small Business


Is your company eligible to be featured in an Intel Small Business Case Study?


The unfulfilled promise of voice over the Web March 5, 2002 
By K. K. Campbell

IT WAS ONE OF THE GREAT PROMISES OF THE INTERNET REVOLUTION: MAKE LONGDISTANCE CALLS FOR FREE OVER THE WEB USING A TECHNOLOGY CALLED VOICE over Internet Protocol (VoIP). The year was 1995, and VocalTec had just introduced its first Internet phone software.

The logic was tantalizing; people were already using e-mail to keep in touch with friends and family scattered around the planet, saving countless dollars in longdistance charges. Why not extend that capability to voice communications? The letters and numbers typed into an e-mail and the vocal modulation of a voice-to-voice conversation are ultimately both information, and the ’net can transmit all kinds of data.

But something didn’t work.The problem was the volume of data.

Connection terminated

A voice call carries a lot more information than does an alpha-numeric transmission.

When you count the number of words in a phone call and compare that to an e-mail, the total might be exactly the same. But the human voice carries an incredible amount of non-word signals, such as tone and tempo, that also have to be transmitted.

Because the communication is so much more complex—and occurring in real-time—it requires vastly more reliable networks. E-mail, by comparison, departs and finds its destination without reliance on the schedules of the sender and recipient.

It does not travel through a direct connection but is broken into packets of data that are reassembled on the other end, and it’s easy to lose a packet.

This system can cause dropped words or delays when used for voice transmission.

In other words, VoIP requires fast connections and reliable systems to reassemble voice communications.

Neither of those is ubiquitous today.

That’s why in 2001, real-time reliable telephony remains one of the great unfulfilled promises of the Internet.

But it’s closer than ever.

Who’s calling, please?

Today, you can call PC-to-PC, phone-to-PC and PC-to-phone. There are millions of people using different variations of this set-up.

Consumers: Many consumers are willing to endure even the crudest of setups.

They plug $10 microphones into their computers and use global chat systems like ICQ to place voice-to-voice calls. ICQ itself is free and there’s no extra charge for the ICQ phone option.

The quality is invariably awful but the savings can be terrific, especially when calling relatives overseas. Many people also use services like ICQ as singles meeting places, and there’s extra security in giving out an ICQ number as opposed to the treasured home phone number.

Microsoft recently announced improvements to its voice system called Messenger, which lets people chat directly, much like ICQ. Messenger users are now able to make PC-to-phone calls using the new Windows XP operating system.

Public carriers: The big voice players are already getting into the Internet telephony game, and IDC expects that by 2004, 15 per cent of U.S. long distance traffic will be handled by the Internet.

Nortel Networks sold VoIP equipment to U.S. public carrier Qwest, which is among the first local carriers to move toward Internet telephony, replacing its traditional circuit-switch networks. Qwest is planning for additional packet-switched network deployments throughout its 14-state region.

As of October 2001, Nortel had sold more than one million voice over packet ports, which offer the following features:

• Video caller ID: your picture will be flashed to the person you are calling

• Incoming call routing: office phones can be programmed to forward to various numbers at certain times of day or to give scripted messages to specific callers

• Simultaneous ringing: when you really need to contact someone fast you can call all of their numbers at the same time

• Desktop videoconferencing: many believe quality video meetings conducted desk-to-desk will enhance security, reduce airport hassle and save on travel costs—and still retain the power of human interface

Business: Business doesn’t have the same cost/benefit analysis as consumers do. Most managers won’t opt for saving thousands of long-distance dollars if they are continually irritating customers and suppliers or hampering personnel communication to the point that corporate performance falls.

Small businesses can be more aggressive in finding VoIP solutions.

The cost of change is lower and the return on investment can be much higher. In Toronto, Fox-Hoey, a five-person communications consultancy, has migrated to an Internet Protocol communications server.The company has integrated fax/messaging, Internet, data and voice and believes this will reduce operating costs by combining the administration of two separate networks into one.

Many businesses are creating a mix of systems; some large companies are testing the waters by first rolling out intranet IP telephony—in other words, using staff and friendly associates as VoIP guinea pigs.

Businesses are well advised to keep a watchful eye on VoIP developments. It will soon be stable and secure enough to stand alone. And when that day comes, business will no longer fear phone calls like: “I am [gap] you over [lag] on this deal [silence] loving every minute of it, you [long delay—call dropped].”

Instead, your customer will hear you loud and clear: “I am calling you over our new IP phone. The company saves longdistance charges on this deal.We’re high tech and loving every minute of it, you should look into it!”

W e b p h o n e s

ICQ http://web.icq.com
IDC http://www.idc.ca
Microsoft http://www.microsoft.com
Nortel Networks http://www.nortel.com
VocalTec http://www.vocaltec.com
Top Lists


Top 7 social networking
Web sites

more lists>>
Top 300 Issue
 
Gadget of the Week (Canadian)



Parla italiano?
Lingo Voyager 4

If you’re heading out on vacation and you don’t speak the local language, consider picking up a Voyager 4. About the size of a large PDA, it’s a 14-language talking translator that handles English, German, Portuguese, Dutch, French, Spanish, Italian, Russian, Chinese, Japanese, Korean, Greek, Arabic and Hebrew.

more>>
Gadget of the Week (Japanese)




Sounds of Japan
Why record just the visual when you can capture the sounds as well.

more>>
Backblog RSS feed
Click to subscribe
© 2006-2007 Backbone Magazine. All Rights Reserved. Privacy Policy | Terms of Use.