Most of the clients we work with grow at least to some degree via mergers and acquisitions of other companies. Either they want to branch into new markets, acquire new customers, and/or leverage operational competencies of other companies. Regardless of the drivers of these M&A activities, there are a number of operational and strategic risks and pain points that unfortunately often aren’t adequately addressed by organizations.

For example, the following are several challenges when a company merges with or acquires another company:

While companies are often aware of these challenges before they engage in their M&A due diligence, they typically fall short on execution in addressing them. We typically are hired several years after a merger or acquisition, and often times after several M&A transactions, when the pain becomes too obvious and disruptive to the business.

Although these challenges will always exist in a merger or acquisition to some extent, they don’t necessarily need to be as painful as most organizations let them become. After several years of operational misalignment, the differences between these merged companies become glaring as executives begin to see the costs associated with multiple ERP systems, different ways of doing the same processes, and lack of a shared services vision to help minimize redundancies and increase scale in the organization. After all, most of these expected benefits were likely identified as financial justification for the transaction, so it is appropriate that executives will eventually focus on addressing these items.

One potential solution to proactively address these misalignments before they become too disruptive is to define an ERP business blueprint for the overall organization. If a parent company has clearly defined processes, job roles, key performance indicators, system configurations, and other operational and enterprise software clarity, rolling M&A companies into the parent organization will be significantly smoother. In addition, the parent company’s blueprint will help define the direction the new organizations should go in regard to potential new ERP systems or upgrades, rather than necessarily keeping their legacy systems intact.

Below are just a handful of operational, organizational, and technical issues that should be defined in an ERP business blueprint:

Once these items have been defined for the overall company, M&A integration becomes much more efficient and results in higher business benefits. In the shorter term, it helps companies with multiple business units gain efficiencies through standardization.

Originally posted on 360º ERP Blog


The Key to Consolidating a Merger or Acquisition: ERP Software Business Blueprint

Categories

All

General

Accessibility

Business events

Business innovation

Cloud computing

Communications

Copyright

Data centers

Digital economy strategy

Economic development Canada

eCommerce

eHealth

eLearning

Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP)

Gadgets

Geo-blocking

Green technology

Investment

Mashups

Mobility

New technologies

Olympic technology

Outsourcing

Project management

Sales and marketing

Security

SMB

Social media

Social networking

Software as a Service (SaaS)

Speakers Corner

Start Up Innovation Campaign

Tech events

Technology law

Technology start-ups

Trends

Unified Communications

Usage based billing

Web 2.0

Wireless


Archives

May 2012

April 2012

March 2012

February 2012

January 2012

December 2011

November 2011

October 2011

September 2011

August 2011

July 2011

June 2011

May 2011

April 2011

March 2011

February 2011

January 2011

December 2010

November 2010

October 2010

September 2010

August 2010

July 2010

June 2010

May 2010

April 2010

March 2010

February 2010

January 2010

July 12, 2011 12:30 PM

Most of the clients we work with grow at least to some degree via mergers and acquisitions of other companies. Either they want to branch into new markets, acquire new customers, and/or leverage operational competencies of other companies. Regardless of the drivers of these M&A activities, there are a number of operational and strategic risks and pain points that unfortunately often aren’t adequately addressed by organizations.

For example, the following are several challenges when a company merges with or acquires another company:

  • Different business processes and workflows
  • Different products
  • Different customers, with different ways of servicing those customers
  • Different ERP systems
  • Silo mentality among employees

While companies are often aware of these challenges before they engage in their M&A due diligence, they typically fall short on execution in addressing them. We typically are hired several years after a merger or acquisition, and often times after several M&A transactions, when the pain becomes too obvious and disruptive to the business.

Although these challenges will always exist in a merger or acquisition to some extent, they don’t necessarily need to be as painful as most organizations let them become. After several years of operational misalignment, the differences between these merged companies become glaring as executives begin to see the costs associated with multiple ERP systems, different ways of doing the same processes, and lack of a shared services vision to help minimize redundancies and increase scale in the organization. After all, most of these expected benefits were likely identified as financial justification for the transaction, so it is appropriate that executives will eventually focus on addressing these items.

One potential solution to proactively address these misalignments before they become too disruptive is to define an ERP business blueprint for the overall organization. If a parent company has clearly defined processes, job roles, key performance indicators, system configurations, and other operational and enterprise software clarity, rolling M&A companies into the parent organization will be significantly smoother. In addition, the parent company’s blueprint will help define the direction the new organizations should go in regard to potential new ERP systems or upgrades, rather than necessarily keeping their legacy systems intact.

Below are just a handful of operational, organizational, and technical issues that should be defined in an ERP business blueprint:

  • Standard business processes and workflows
  • Organizational roles and responsibilities within the new ERP business processes
  • Key performance indicators for each process
  • Systems and tools to be used to complete each step in the process

Once these items have been defined for the overall company, M&A integration becomes much more efficient and results in higher business benefits. In the shorter term, it helps companies with multiple business units gain efficiencies through standardization.

Originally posted on 360º ERP Blog

Blogger Profile: Eric Kimberling
With over fifteen years of consulting experience, Eric Kimberling has a wide range of professional expertise in companies ranging from the SMB market to large corporations. Eric’s background includes extensive ERP software selection, ERP organizational change, and ERP implementation project management experience. 

Twitter: http://twitter.com/erickimberling  
Linkedin: http://www.linkedin.com/in/erickimberling  

Posted by Sue Ansell at July 12, 2011 12:30 PM

Categories: Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP)

Comments

Name
URL (remove the http://)
Email
Comments (field is limited to 2000 characters)
   

TrackBack Link

Bookmark and Share           Print Page          Email To A Friend
Start Me Up Innovation Campaign winner

WCIT C200 Investment Forum


Insightful business speaker Jim Harris talks innovation in 
Speaker's Corner 

Backbone magazine Speakers' Corner 

Backbone magazine latest digital issue

Backbone's Cloud Portal

Backbone's Digital Economy Acceleration Committee

Backbonemag on Twitter