The Liberals released their election platform yesterday [April 3, 2011] and for those anxious for digital issues to occupy part of the policy debate during the campaign (myself included), we got our wish. The document identifies the digital economy as one of its three key areas for economic growth and features eight principles that includes broadband for all, bridging the digital divide, copyright, and an Open Internet.

At the start of the campaign, I highlighted ten digital economy questions that need answers and the Liberals have taken a good step at answering many of them. There is still need for greater detail, but at least they've put forward something to debate. By contrast, Industry Minister Tony Clement quickly tweeted that the Liberal document "borrows" from his digital strategy, yet unless I missed a press release, no Conservative digital strategy has been made public. There has been a digital economy strategy consultation, the creation of a government department within Industry Canada, a speech on a strategy that provided preliminary views, and elements of what will likely form the strategy (ie. open government), but none of these are the strategy itself. If Clement believes it borrows from his unreleased strategy, that only emphasizes how the issue is non-partisan and should be prioritized by all parties.

With respect to the strategy itself, perhaps its most significant aspect was the promise to use the revenues from the forthcoming spectrum auction to facilitate broadband access in underserved areas. In fact, sources advise that the commitments to fund CBC/Radio-Canada and the Canada Council for digital content creation will also come from spectrum revenues. Given that the auction is expected to generate billions of dollars, this is very significant. The revenues from the last spectrum auction went to general revenues (critics argue it went to the automotive industry). A commitment to use the spectrum revenues for purposes directly related to connectivity, culture, and the digital economy is an important step forward and helps ensure that new initiatives need not come out of tax revenues. It will be interesting to see if the Conservatives and NDP make a similar commitment.

If allocating spectrum revenues toward the digital economy was the most promising aspect of the strategy, the most disappointing was the failure to link its digital economy strategy with its broader policy platform. For example, the Liberals have focused heavily on education during the election campaign, choosing the issue as their very first policy announcement. The Liberal platform similarly focuses on education, with a large section devoted to its learning strategy. Yet despite the interest in education, the issue is oddly absent from its digital economy strategy (with the exception of digital skills training).  This is a missed opportunity - placing education within its digital economy strategy could have included taking a stand on education within fair dealing, on using its open government principle to commit to making government funded research available under open access, and to using research and education high speed networks to foster innovation and extended connectivity.

The absence of a cross-cutting approach is also missing from the issue of competitiveness and the digital economy. There is a solid proposal to help fund digital startups, a commitment to the open Internet, and a vague reference to "competition in a healthy business environment that rewards innovation." I don't really know what that last principle actually means in practice. It would have been far better to take a position on competition and innovation by taking a stand on foreign investment in telecoms (the government punted on the issue in the fall), on steps to address concerns with competition and Internet access (including retail UBB), and a position on vertical integration in the broadcast and telecom sectors. These are all key competitive issues but the platform remains largely silent on each.

Overall, the Liberal strategy is a good start that should help promote more debate on the issue during the campaign (though as an aside the intent to move toward online elections runs counter to most experts in the field who caution against it). The test will now be whether the opposition parties give the digital economy similar prominence within their platforms. As I noted in my post yesterday, over to you, Conservatives and NDP...

Originally posted on Michael Geist's Blog

Reflecting on The Liberal Digital Economy Strategy

Categories

All

General

Accessibility

Business events

Business innovation

Cloud computing

Communications

Copyright

Data centers

Digital economy strategy

Economic development Canada

eCommerce

eHealth

eLearning

Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP)

Gadgets

Geo-blocking

Green technology

Investment

Mashups

Mobility

New technologies

Olympic technology

Outsourcing

Project management

Sales and marketing

Security

SMB

Social media

Social networking

Software as a Service (SaaS)

Speakers Corner

Start Up Innovation Campaign

Tech events

Technology law

Technology start-ups

Trends

Unified Communications

Usage based billing

Web 2.0

Wireless


Archives

May 2012

April 2012

March 2012

February 2012

January 2012

December 2011

November 2011

October 2011

September 2011

August 2011

July 2011

June 2011

May 2011

April 2011

March 2011

February 2011

January 2011

December 2010

November 2010

October 2010

September 2010

August 2010

July 2010

June 2010

May 2010

April 2010

March 2010

February 2010

January 2010

April 7, 2011 12:15 PM

The Liberals released their election platform yesterday [April 3, 2011] and for those anxious for digital issues to occupy part of the policy debate during the campaign (myself included), we got our wish.

The document identifies the digital economy as one of its three key areas for economic growth and features eight principles that includes broadband for all, bridging the digital divide, copyright, and an Open Internet.

At the start of the campaign, I highlighted ten digital economy questions that need answers and the Liberals have taken a good step at answering many of them. There is still need for greater detail, but at least they've put forward something to debate. By contrast, Industry Minister Tony Clement quickly tweeted that the Liberal document "borrows" from his digital strategy, yet unless I missed a press release, no Conservative digital strategy has been made public. There has been a digital economy strategy consultation, the creation of a government department within Industry Canada, a speech on a strategy that provided preliminary views, and elements of what will likely form the strategy (ie. open government), but none of these are the strategy itself. If Clement believes it borrows from his unreleased strategy, that only emphasizes how the issue is non-partisan and should be prioritized by all parties.

With respect to the strategy itself, perhaps its most significant aspect was the promise to use the revenues from the forthcoming spectrum auction to facilitate broadband access in underserved areas. In fact, sources advise that the commitments to fund CBC/Radio-Canada and the Canada Council for digital content creation will also come from spectrum revenues. Given that the auction is expected to generate billions of dollars, this is very significant. The revenues from the last spectrum auction went to general revenues (critics argue it went to the automotive industry). A commitment to use the spectrum revenues for purposes directly related to connectivity, culture, and the digital economy is an important step forward and helps ensure that new initiatives need not come out of tax revenues. It will be interesting to see if the Conservatives and NDP make a similar commitment.

If allocating spectrum revenues toward the digital economy was the most promising aspect of the strategy, the most disappointing was the failure to link its digital economy strategy with its broader policy platform. For example, the Liberals have focused heavily on education during the election campaign, choosing the issue as their very first policy announcement. The Liberal platform similarly focuses on education, with a large section devoted to its learning strategy. Yet despite the interest in education, the issue is oddly absent from its digital economy strategy (with the exception of digital skills training).  This is a missed opportunity - placing education within its digital economy strategy could have included taking a stand on education within fair dealing, on using its open government principle to commit to making government funded research available under open access, and to using research and education high speed networks to foster innovation and extended connectivity.

The absence of a cross-cutting approach is also missing from the issue of competitiveness and the digital economy. There is a solid proposal to help fund digital startups, a commitment to the open Internet, and a vague reference to "competition in a healthy business environment that rewards innovation." I don't really know what that last principle actually means in practice. It would have been far better to take a position on competition and innovation by taking a stand on foreign investment in telecoms (the government punted on the issue in the fall), on steps to address concerns with competition and Internet access (including retail UBB), and a position on vertical integration in the broadcast and telecom sectors. These are all key competitive issues but the platform remains largely silent on each.

Overall, the Liberal strategy is a good start that should help promote more debate on the issue during the campaign (though as an aside the intent to move toward online elections runs counter to most experts in the field who caution against it). The test will now be whether the opposition parties give the digital economy similar prominence within their platforms. As I noted in my post yesterday, over to you, Conservatives and NDP...

Originally posted on Michael Geist's Blog

Blogger Profile: Michael Geist
Dr. Michael Geist is a law professor at the University of Ottawa where he holds the Canada Research Chair in Internet and E-commerce Law. Dr. Geist has written numerous academic articles and government reports on the Internet and law and was a member of Canada's National Task Force on Spam. He is an internationally syndicated columnist on technology law issues. He is an internationally syndicated columnist on technology law issues.

Posted by Sue Ansell at April 7, 2011 12:15 PM

Categories: Digital economy strategy

Comments

Name
URL (remove the http://)
Email
Comments (field is limited to 2000 characters)
   

TrackBack Link

Bookmark and Share           Print Page          Email To A Friend
Start Me Up Innovation Campaign winner

WCIT C200 Investment Forum


Insightful business speaker Jim Harris talks innovation in 
Speaker's Corner 

Backbone magazine Speakers' Corner 

Backbone magazine latest digital issue

Backbone's Cloud Portal

Backbone's Digital Economy Acceleration Committee

Backbonemag on Twitter