Magazine Subscribe Events Careers Backblog About Press Releases Media Kit Supplements Books
Investment How to blog with Backbone
Current Issue

Backbone TV


NEW Geoweb video
Portals
Backbone's information on...


Careers

Data Management

Economic Development

Education

Green
New Supplement

Health

Olympic Tech

Outsourcing 

Security 
New Supplement

Social Networking

Tech Associations Canada

Travel

Unified Communications & VoIP

Web 2.0

Wireless 
Multimedia

sponsored by



Videos - NEW

Small Business
Case Studies -NEW

Webcasts

How-to Guides

Guide for Small Business


Is your company eligible to be featured in an Intel Small Business Case Study?

Don’t trust Wikipedia for anything critical September 11, 2007 

Want to know who played Miracle Max in The Princess Bride? Hit www.wikipedia.org. The information is there and it’s most likely accurate. And if you’re itching to know which year Amelia Earhart disappeared, Wikipedia is probably okay for that too.

That type of information is non-critical: it doesn’t relate to a company’s reputation, a politician’s actions or a country’s human rights record. But for information that may contain an adverse comment on anyone or anything, go somewhere else.

That’s because anyone who doesn’t like what Wikipedia says can simply change it, and while that’s always been well known it has now been confirmed that individuals and organizations are actively editing their wiki profiles.

A Cal Tech grad student by the name of Virgil Griffith created a nifty little database application called Wikipedia Scanner (http://wikiscanner.virgil.gr). It scans the millions of daily Wikipedia edits and then links those to the IP address of the computer that originated the changes. Those addresses can then be tied to the companies that own them.

Griffith has confirmed entries are regularly changed. In just one example, extensive cuts were made to the critical bits of an entry on voting-machine maker Diebold. The computer that made the edits came from Diebold’s office.

Scanner now has information on more than 35 million edits and, while the site’s interface is difficult to navigate, Griffith’s investigative efforts make fascinating reading.

The upshot of this is people looking for information on a new drug, for example, could conceivably start the search at Wikipedia but they must conduct further research. The wiki entry praising the drug’s benefits and dismissing its potential side effects could easily have been written by the drug company itself.

Peter Wolchak

Posted September 11, 2007
Categories: Social Networking

Comments

Add Your Comment
Name
Email*
Comments
   
Backblog Archives

June 2008

May 2008

April 2008

March 2008

February 2008

January 2008

December 2007

November 2007

October 2007

September 2007

August 2007

July 2007

June 2007

May 2007

April 2007

March 2007

February 2007

January 2007

Top Lists

 

Top 50 Technology Companies

more Top lists>>
Top 300 Issue
 
Gadget of the Week (Canadian)



Pick the best 3G for you 
RIM BlackBerry Bold 

Choosing the right smartphone is an important decision, and here’s the good news: while both the new iPhone and the Bold are excellent, the feel is entirely different, making it easy to choose.

more>>
Gadget of the Week (Japanese)




Sounds of Japan
Why record just the visual when you can capture the sounds as well.

more>>
Backblog RSS feed
Click to subscribe
© 2006-2007 Backbone Magazine. All Rights Reserved. Privacy Policy | Terms of Use.