
eMail is for Losers | May 16, 2008
|
For many years I have been saying 'email is for losers'. The way email is used and the way email systems have been designed—I felt there is something fundamentally wrong with the picture.
Recall the 'good old times' when there was no email system and we relied on a simple system of ink/paper for sending mail. One cannot dispute that the correspondence/communication had clear structure as well the documents themselves. If this was possible for paper-based communication then why it can't be extended to electronic communication—and to any document created today? We already have the capability to send a document within an application (MS Office, StarOffice, OpenOffice, etc.). What is lacking is the capability to store the communication ('email') in the same manner as we are able to store the other documents. Also lacking is the ability, tools, and structure to enable the inclusion of meta data on these types of documents. What we should have is:
It would then be possible to have a (database) engine to facilitate creation, access, and retrieval of the stored documents/data—independent of the client in use. Benefits:
Additional systems accessing the storage—data mining, search, collaboration, contextual association, workflow. What it would it mean to you:
Here you can see the diagram of email 2.0 Vaclav Vincalek Posted May 16, 2008 Categories: Web 2.0 Comments Add Your Comment |






